NLP and seduction have long been associated with each other. Nero Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a term used to describe the way in which our brains adhere to specific patterns of communication dependent on our personality type.  Once we can begin to understand these patterns, triggers and Meta models, we can use them to our advantage whilst communicating with women.

When we cause a womanUnderground Seduction

The latest high quality seduction package at an unbeatable price...Learn the secrets...$15 discount.. to align and harmonize with our desires and intentions through the use of effective communication, it is known as seduction.

This is why NLP and seduction can work wonders together. When a man is able to quickly analyze and decode a woman’s communications, he can easily build rapport and establish trust which in turn generates a connection that the seduction can be founded upon.

People will primarily use one of four different representational systems to communicate and the system they adopt is dependent on their personality type. The systems are known as kinesthetic, visual, audio and olfactory. If a man converses with a woman whilst utilizing her primary system he is able to establish a connection with her much faster.

If someone adopts the visual representational system as their personal hierarchy, their conversations will have words in them that are related to vision. You would hear them say such sentences as, “I see exactly what you mean. I couldn’t picture it at first, but now that I can, it has totally changed my point of view”

Using the same representational system as a woman can be quiet easy to do with a little practice. When a man becomes proficient at this practice it can seem to the woman as if he understands her and is speaking her language.

If a woman’s primary representational system was ‘audio’, you would hear her use terminology like, “It just sounded like a good idea. When I heard it I tuned in straight away. His voice had a soft tone so I had to listen carefully and I’m glad I did”

If the kinaesthetic system is her personal hierarchy you’ll hear numerous words in sentences that will be associated with feelings and touch. An example would be, “I don’t feel like I’ve touched on the subject properly with him. I wish he’d warm to the idea and talk about it because I feel it would soften his hurt somewhat”

It’s not too often that people use the olfactory system as their preferred hierarchy as it’s more common for people to be either kinaesthitic, visual’s or audio’s. An example of the olfactory system is, “He’s got great taste. I didn’t feel bitter at all when he said he might not be able to make it. But he showed up any way and it was the icing on my cake”

Now that you’re aware of how the different systems operate you’ll be able to easily pick up on what system a woman is primarily using. You can then use that system to communicate with her much more effectively. Below is an example of a communication breakdown on a very subliminal level.

If a woman was communicating with you and she said, “I like the look of that place and I can picture myself going there someday”, she would be classified as a ‘visual’. If a man was to respond using the ‘audio’ system with something like, “That does sound good. It’s got a good vibe and it seems nice and peaceful like you could just tune out. I hear you and its quiet a good idea, I must say”

In the above example the man is in total agreement with the woman, yet to her, it’s as if the man just doesn’t see things her way. At a subconscious level the woman will not feel the same quality of connection that she would’ve if the man had simply responded with, “Indeed, that does look enticing. I could picture myself there too. You should look into it” This simple shift from an ‘audio’ to a ‘visual’ response would allow the woman to feel a deeper connection with the man.

When a man pays a little attention to a woman’s representational system while he is communicating with her it can make all the difference. She’ll feel a lot more comfortable around him much sooner than if he was to totally ignore these dynamics of the conversation.